Which of the following statements is NOT TRUE regarding federal and state fair housing laws?

Prepare for the Real Estate Risk Management Test. Utilize interactive questions and detailed explanations to build confidence before the exam. Gain insights into risk analysis and strategic management for real estate success!

The statement that is not true regarding federal and state fair housing laws is that states may require less restrictive enforcement of fair housing laws. This is because federal law establishes minimum protections against housing discrimination, but states are allowed to implement stricter regulations. If a state enacts a fair housing law that provides greater protection to individuals beyond the federal minimum, that law is valid and enforceable.

Options that indicate stronger protections, such as a state's ability to enforce stricter fair housing laws, reflect the nature of the interplay between state and federal legislation, where states can build on federal standards in order to more comprehensively address discrimination. Additionally, the role of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as the federal body responsible for administering these laws further supports the framework that states can enhance protections, but they cannot impose a standard that goes against basic federal protections.

In summary, the relationship between federal and state fair housing laws allows for increased protections at the state level, rather than allowing for less stringent enforcement.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy